Pinterest
Pinterest
The Ambiguous Ending of The Thing: Keith David Speaks Out
Childs' Perspective
A Scientist's Defense
Keith David, who played Childs in the iconic 1982 sci-fi film The Thing, has come to the defense of the movie's ambiguous ending. In an interview with Syfy Wire, David spoke about his character's perspective on the events that unfold in the film.
The Thing, directed by John Carpenter, follows a group of scientists who are stationed at a remote Antarctic base. When they encounter a shape-shifting alien, they must fight for their survival while questioning who they can trust. The film's ending is notoriously ambiguous, leaving viewers to speculate on whether Childs, the last surviving human, is infected with the alien.
David believes that Childs is not infected. He argues that Childs' actions throughout the film, such as his willingness to sacrifice himself to save his remaining crewmates, demonstrate his humanity. "Childs is a good man," David said. "He's not going to turn into a monster."
David's interpretation of the ending is sure to spark debate among fans of the film. However, his perspective offers a compelling argument for the humanity of Childs and the ambiguity of the film's conclusion.
Comments